GitHub View CyteType

Understanding your report

How CyteType report modules fit together when you review annotations.

Every CyteType report is structured around the same set of sections. Each answers a specific question your biology team will ask when reviewing annotations.

Use this page as a map, then open the module pages for deeper guidance on what to look for and when to act.

Report modules

  1. Ontology-anchored annotation — Cell Ontology terms, confidence, and label match
  2. Functional state resolution — Activation, exhaustion, and other programs beyond cell type
  3. Coarse lineage map — High-level lineage grouping before subtypes
  4. Marker-level evidence — Supporting, missing, and unexpected genes
  5. Confidence and heterogeneity QC — Certainty and mixed-cluster signals
  6. Multi-expert synthesis — Reviewer agreement and alternatives
  7. Study-aware context — How your study framing shapes labels
  8. Ranked pathway signals — GO and WikiPathways enrichment
  9. Linked citations trail — PubMed-backed gene claims
  10. Decision traceability — Candidate funnel and rejection reasons
  11. Interactive Cluster Copilot — Ask questions grounded in the cluster data
  12. Audit-ready export — Table export for downstream and regulatory use

💡 Tip: Start with ontology terms and confidence, then use marker evidence and decision traceability when a call looks surprising.

Learn more

How CyteType works

Limits and interpretation